- Accessibility
- 12 min
Key Web Accessibility Laws for the Private Sector in the USA, UK, and EU
Explore the landscape of the pivotal web accessibility laws for private businesses in the developed countries and learn practical tips for compliance.
This is the second post about our approach to implementing web accessibility guidelines. This time, we explain how we're working to meet the tougher WCAG Level AA requirements.
Welcome to the second part of our series, where we delve into the essential Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) and our dedicated approach to their implementation.
Our main priority is to create an accessible and user-friendly digital environment for all users, including those with disabilities. In this post, we continue our discussion with the guidelines at the more challenging WCAG Level AA.
We provide an in-depth exploration of each recommendation, its importance, who benefits most, and our approach to ensuring compliance. We believe that understanding and implementing these guidelines is vital for a more inclusive and accessible web experience for everyone.
Let’s get started.
First off, let’s take a moment to discuss how Level A differs from Level AA, and why the latter can present more challenges in implementation.
As a reminder, Level A is the most basic level of web accessibility. It includes the most critical and fundamental accessibility features that a website should have. For instance, providing text alternatives for non-text content, ensuring that all functionalities are available from a keyboard, and offering users the ability to stop, pause, or hide moving, blinking, or scrolling information. Meeting Level A conformance is crucial to ensure your site is not extremely difficult or impossible for certain users to access.
Level AA, on the other hand, encompasses a more comprehensive set of requirements. It includes all Level A criteria, plus additional guidelines that address common issues faced by users with disabilities.
These guidelines could include providing captions for all live audio content, offering multiple ways to find web pages, and ensuring that text and images of text have a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1.
The transition from Level A to Level AA can be challenging for several reasons:
Despite these challenges, striving for at least Level AA compliance is highly recommended. It significantly improves the user experience for people with disabilities, helps avoid potential legal issues related to accessibility, and ultimately, expands your website’s reach to a broader audience.
So, what are the key Level AA guidelines and how do we implement them to make your websites more accessible and user-friendly? Let’s talk about it next.
WCAG Recommendation 1.2.4 states that captions must be provided for the entire audio content in live synchronized media.
The importance of this recommendation lies in the fact that it promotes inclusivity and equal access to information and entertainment. Individuals who rely on captions, such as those who are deaf or hard of hearing, should not be excluded from participating in live events or accessing important audio content.
By providing captions for live synchronized media, such as videos or livestreams, the content becomes accessible to people who cannot hear or have difficulty hearing the audio. Captions display text that represents the spoken content, allowing individuals with hearing impairments to understand and engage with the video content.
Furthermore, captions also benefit individuals who are in environments where listening to audio is not feasible or desirable, such as in noisy environments or in situations where silence is required.
Captions provide an alternative way to consume the content without relying on audio alone.
Our approach to implementing the WCAG Captions (Live) recommendation involves providing captions for live broadcasts. We also use media players or broadcast platforms that support live captioning.
WCAG Recommendation 1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded) states that prerecorded video content should include audio descriptions that provide a verbal narration of visual elements, actions, and other important details that are not conveyed through the main audio track.
This recommendation is crucial because it ensures that individuals who are blind or have low vision can fully understand and enjoy video content. Without audio descriptions, these users would miss out on vital information presented visually, such as facial expressions, gestures, scene changes, and other visual cues that enhance the understanding and enjoyment of videos.
By providing audio descriptions, content creators and developers can make their videos inclusive and accessible to a broader audience. People who benefit the most from this recommendation are those with visual impairments, including blind individuals, who rely on audio descriptions to understand the visual content being presented.
Audio descriptions enable visually impaired individuals to engage with various types of video content, such as movies, TV shows, educational videos, training materials, and online courses. It enhances their overall media experience by allowing them to follow the story, characters, actions, and any visual elements that are essential to the narrative.
In addition to benefiting visually impaired individuals, audio descriptions can also be helpful for other users, such as those with cognitive disabilities or those learning a new language. Audio descriptions provide additional context and clarification, making the content more understandable and meaningful.
To implement the 1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded) WCAG recommendation, we take the following steps:
NOTE
Whether we can implement this guideline depends on the specific details of your design and the files that you provide.
The WCAG 1.3.4 Orientation recommendation emphasizes the importance of creating digital content that is flexible across different device orientations.
The WCAG 1.3.4 Orientation recommendation is incredibly important for several reasons.
Firstly, it promotes inclusivity and accessibility in digital content. By not restricting content to a single display orientation, we ensure that everyone, regardless of their physical abilities or device usage preferences, can access and interact with the content effectively. This is a crucial aspect of designing for all users, not just a majority.
Secondly, it acknowledges and respects user autonomy. Some users might prefer one orientation over another due to personal comfort or specific use cases. For example, landscape mode might be preferable for watching videos or playing games, while portrait mode might be more convenient for reading text. By allowing both orientations, we give users the freedom to choose how they want to consume the content.
Thirdly, it enhances usability and user experience. A design that works well in both orientations shows that thought has been put into the user’s interaction with the product. It also allows for better use of screen real estate, especially on devices with larger displays.
Lastly, this recommendation is important because it future-proofs digital content. As technology evolves and new types of devices emerge, the flexibility of display orientation will become even more crucial. Adhering to this guideline ensures that the content will remain accessible and user-friendly, no matter what the future holds.
This recommendation is particularly beneficial for individuals with certain types of disabilities. For instance, people with physical disabilities may have their devices mounted in a fixed orientation and may not be able to easily switch between portrait and landscape modes. Similarly, some users might have dexterity impairments that make it difficult to rotate their devices.
Moreover, this recommendation also enhances the overall user experience as it provides flexibility in terms of how content can be viewed. It is especially relevant in the current digital age, where people use a variety of devices such as smartphones, tablets, and laptops, each with their unique display characteristics.
In essence, the WCAG 1.3.4 Orientation recommendation encourages designers and developers to consider the diverse needs of their audience, ensuring that their digital content is accessible to as many users as possible, regardless of how they choose to view it.
Here’s how we implement the WCAG 1.3.4 Orientation recommendation:
WCAG recommendation 1.3.5 requires that the purpose of a form input field can be programmatically determined when it collects information about the user.
The people who benefit most from this guideline are:
In order to fully implement the 1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose WCAG recommendation, we follow these steps:
For a complete list of input types, click here.
WCAG recommendation 1.4.3 aims to enhance the readability of text on web pages. This guideline stipulates that visual presentation of text and images of text should have a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1, except for large text (18 point or 14 point bold), which should have a contrast ratio of at least 3:1.
The guideline ensures that textual content is easily discernible to all users, including those with low vision, color blindness, or other visual impairments. By adhering to this guideline, designers can ensure that their content is accessible to a larger audience, thereby promoting inclusivity.
Those who benefit most from this guideline are people with visual impairments. For instance, individuals with low vision often struggle to decipher text that does not contrast well with its background. Similarly, people with color blindness might find it challenging to read text if the color of the text and its background are too similar.
This guideline can also improve the reading experience for users in certain scenarios, such as viewing a screen in bright sunlight or on a device with a low-quality display. Therefore, by adhering to the Contrast (Minimum) guideline, web designers can enhance the overall user experience, making their content more readable and accessible for everyone.
Here’s how we implement the 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) WCAG recommendation:
NOTE
As for implementing this WCAG recommendation, the approach largely hinges on the design and your openness to adjustments to ensure compliance with color contrast requirements.
If you share a design with us and we identify any color contrast issues, we can take the following steps:
Request a list of colors to replace those in the design.
Propose alternative colors from our end.
Leave the design unchanged.
The optimal strategy is to choose appropriate colors during the initial design phase. This minimizes the need for extensive color changes throughout the entire project, which would require your approval.
Altering colors might necessitate additional design updates during the development stage, something we aim to avoid whenever possible.
The WCAG 1.4.4 recommendation on Text Resize stipulates that web content should be implemented in such a way that it can be resized up to 200% without loss of content or functionality.
This recommendation is important for several reasons:
The primary beneficiaries of this recommendation are those with low vision, including older people who often experience a decrease in vision with age. However, it also benefits users who have difficulty reading small text on screens of varying sizes.
To implement this WCAG recommendation, we take the following steps:
The WCAG recommendation 1.4.5 states that if the same visual presentation can be made using text alone, an image should not be used to present this information. The exception is when a particular presentation of text is essential to the information being conveyed.
The rationale behind this rule is that text can be resized without losing clarity, and it can also be read aloud by screen readers, which is beneficial for people who have visual impairments or reading difficulties. Images of text, on the other hand, can be pixelated when zoomed in and are not always compatible with screen readers.
This recommendation is particularly important for people with low vision who may need to increase the size of the text to read it, and for those who rely on text-to-speech technology, such as people with dyslexia, literacy difficulties, or certain types of learning disabilities.
It also benefits people with cognitive disabilities who may find it easier to understand the content when it’s presented in a simple, straightforward manner rather than in a complex image. In addition, users with slow internet connections or limited bandwidth can benefit from this guideline as text generally loads faster and requires less data than images.
In our commitment to adhere to the 1.4.5 Images of Text WCAG recommendation, we undertake the following measures:
NOTE
Whether this option needs to be implemented depends on your design. If images are required for certain text, we may adhere to the guidelines for 1.1.1 Non-Text Content.
The WCAG recommendation 1.4.10, also known as “Reflow,” is an essential guideline that ensures that web content can be presented in different ways without losing information or structure.
The main objective of Reflow is to make sure that content does not require a two-dimensional layout for usage or understanding. Without reflow, zooming in could mean that crucial information becomes hidden off-screen. This can result in a frustrating and inaccessible experience for users who need to zoom in to interact with the content.
Reflow is particularly important for individuals who have low vision and rely on zooming in on web content to read and interact with it. When a user zooms in on a page (up to 400%), reflow ensures that all the content is still available and visible within the viewport. This means that users do not have to scroll horizontally to find information off-screen.
In addition, Reflow benefits users who use mobile or smaller devices, as it ensures that content can adapt to fit different screen sizes without losing information or structure. This makes the web more accessible and usable for everyone, regardless of their device or accessibility needs.
Here’s how we approach the implementation of this WCAG recommendation:
The WCAG 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast recommendation stipulates that the visual presentation of user interface components and graphical objects must have a contrast ratio of at least 3:1 against adjacent colors. This means that elements such as form input borders, buttons, icons, and graphs need to have sufficient contrast with their backgrounds to ensure they are easily distinguishable.
This recommendation is crucial for a number of reasons:
1. Enhanced visibility. The guideline ensures that important visual information is discernible for all users. This includes those with low vision, color blindness, or older people experiencing changes in vision.
2. User interface usability. With sufficient contrast, users can easily identify interactive components on a web page. This enhances the overall user experience and ensures that the website is easy to navigate.
3. Information comprehension. Graphical representations like charts and graphs are often used to convey complex information. Ensuring significant contrast allows all users, including those with visual impairments, to comprehend this data.
Those who benefit most from this guideline are people with visual impairments such as color blindness and low vision. However, adhering to this standard improves the overall user experience for everyone by making websites more visually clear and easier to navigate.
To implement the WCAG recommendation about contrast ratio, we take the following steps:
NOTE
As for the implementation of this recommendation, a lot depends on the design and your willingness to change something in it in order to meet the non-text contrast requirements.
When we create a design, we can select the right color scheme off the bat. Otherwise, if you provide a design and we notice a non-text contrast problem, we will bring it to your attention and suggest a fix.
At this point, you can either follow our recommendations or opt to select suitable color solutions independently.
The WCAG standard 1.4.12 stipulates that no loss of content or functionality should occur if the user adjusts certain text style parameters. These include line height (line spacing), spacing following paragraphs, letter spacing (tracking), and word spacing. The specifics are:
The primary reason this recommendation is important is because it ensures that web content is accessible to everyone, regardless of their visual abilities or disabilities. People with low vision, dyslexia, and other cognitive or learning disabilities often need to adjust text spacing to read effectively.
Allowing users to manipulate text spacing can significantly improve readability. For example, increasing the space between lines can prevent readers from skipping lines, while increasing the space between words can help users better distinguish one word from another.
While everyone can benefit from clearer, more readable text, this guideline particularly aids:
To ensure compliance with this WCAG recommendation, we adopt the following measures:
The WCAG recommendation 1.4.13 focuses on the behavior of additional content that appears when a user hovers over or focuses on an element. This could be a tooltip, a dropdown menu, or any other type of content that becomes visible due to user interaction.
The importance of this recommendation lies in its three main principles:
The exception mentioned in the recommendation acknowledges that some visual presentations are controlled by the user agent (like browser or operating system) and may not be modified by the author. These might not adhere to the above principles, but they are outside the website author’s control.
This WCAG recommendation is highly beneficial for everyone as it improves the overall usability of web content, but it is particularly crucial for individuals with certain types of disabilities:
In order to adhere to this WCAG recommendation, we take the following steps:
WCAG 2.4.5 recommendation states: “More than one way is available to locate a Web page within a set of Web pages except where the Web Page is the result of, or a step in, a process.”
In simpler terms, it means that there should be multiple ways for users to find and access different web pages on a site. This could include a site map, search function, list of all available web pages, or using links within the text.
The recommendation is crucial for several reasons, primarily revolving around accessibility and usability.
People with disabilities, particularly those with visual impairments or cognitive limitations, benefit the most from this recommendation. For example, visually impaired users who use screen readers can find the information they need more easily if there are multiple navigation options.
Similarly, individuals with cognitive limitations might struggle with complex navigation systems, so having different ways to locate web pages can help them use the site more effectively.
Moreover, this guideline benefits everyone, not just those with disabilities. Having multiple ways to find information improves the overall user experience by making navigation more intuitive and less frustrating. This can lead to higher user satisfaction and engagement, making it a best practice for web design in general.
To implement this WCAG recommendation, we undertake the following measures:
NOTE
We apply the methods listed above when developing a website from scratch, beginning at the design stage. When working with a design that you provide, we can only suggest ways to make your solution more flexible as long as web page search goes. The decision to follow our recommendations is entirely yours.
The WCAG recommendation 2.4.6 emphasizes that headings and labels should be descriptive to help users find content and understand what they will find when they navigate to it.
This recommendation is crucial for several reasons:
The benefits of adhering to this guideline are universal, improving usability for all users. However, certain groups derive particular advantage from this practice:
To implement the Headings and Labels recommendation, we undertake the following actions:
The WCAG recommendation 2.4.7 states that any interactive component on a web page should have a visible indicator when it’s in focus. This means that when users navigate through a website using a keyboard, they should be able to easily see which element they’re currently interacting with.
The importance of this guideline lies in its ability to make the web more accessible, especially for people who rely on keyboard navigation. These could be users with motor disabilities who find it hard to use a mouse, or visually impaired users who use screen readers along with keyboard navigation.
Without a clear focus indicator, these users could easily lose track of where they are on the page, making it difficult for them to interact with the site effectively. A visible focus can be achieved through various design elements like changes in color, addition of borders, or even animations.
This recommendation primarily benefits users who rely on keyboard navigation. This includes:
To ensure adherence to this WCAG recommendation, we undertake the following steps:
The WCAG recommendation 3.1.2 advises that the human language of each passage or phrase in the content can be programmatically determined, except for proper names, technical terms, words of indeterminate language, and words or phrases that have become part of the vernacular of the immediately surrounding text.
For example, if an English web page contains a few sentences in French, those sentences should be marked in a way that lets user agents (like browsers or assistive technologies) know they’re in French.
This guideline is vital because it allows assistive technologies, such as screen readers, to accurately interpret and relay content in its intended language. If the language isn’t correctly marked, the technology may not pronounce the words correctly, leading to confusion and miscommunication.
This guideline is particularly beneficial for individuals who rely on assistive technologies to access online content, including people with visual impairments or literacy difficulties. For instance, someone using a screen reader will have the content read out in the correct accent and pronunciation if the language is properly identified.
Moreover, it’s also useful for anyone who is multilingual, as they can understand the context of language switches, which may otherwise disrupt their comprehension.
To implement this WCAG recommendation, we undertake the following steps:
Example:
<p lang=”en”>English content</p>
<p lang=”fr”>French content</p>
WCAG recommendation 3.2.3 advises that navigation mechanisms that are repeated on multiple web pages within a set of web pages occur in the same relative order each time they are repeated, unless a change is initiated by the user.
Implementing consistent navigation is important for several reasons. Firstly, it helps users become familiar with the structure of your site more quickly. If every page has a different layout or navigation, users can become confused and may struggle to find the information they need. This can lead to a frustrating user experience and may cause users to leave the site.
This WCAG recommendation can be particularly helpful for individuals who have cognitive or learning disabilities, as well as visually impaired users who rely on screen readers to navigate websites.
In addition, this standard can also enhance the overall user experience for all users, not just those with disabilities. By providing a consistent and predictable navigation structure, websites can become more intuitive and easier to use, potentially increasing user engagement and satisfaction.
To ensure the successful implementation of this WCAG recommendation, we undertake the following actions:
The WCAG recommendation 3.2.4 mandates that components or elements with the same functionality should be identified consistently across different web pages within a site.
This recommendation is important for a variety of reasons, all of which contribute to creating a more accessible and user-friendly web experience.
Individuals with cognitive impairments or learning disabilities may struggle with inconsistent identification of elements across a website. If a shopping cart icon is labeled ‘Basket’ on one page and ‘Cart’ on another, it might cause confusion.
Similarly, screen reader users rely on consistent labeling to navigate a site, so variable identification can pose significant challenges.
Furthermore, this recommendation also benefits elderly users who might not be as tech-savvy. Consistent identification across a website can make navigation easier and less confusing for them, enhancing their overall user experience.
To implement this WCAG recommendation, we adhere to the following practices:
WCAG recommendation 3.3.3 focuses on providing appropriate suggestions for correcting input errors when possible.
The importance of this recommendation lies in its ability to enhance the usability and accessibility of websites. When users encounter an error, especially those with cognitive disabilities or those who are not tech-savvy, they might struggle to understand what went wrong and how to fix it. By providing clear and immediate suggestions for error correction, we can mitigate user frustration and help them successfully complete their intended actions.
This recommendation benefits all users by making online navigation smoother and less confusing. However, it’s particularly beneficial for:
To implement this WCAG recommendation, we undertake the following actions:
The primary aim of WCAG recommendation 3.3.4 is to prevent errors from occurring when users are engaged in filling out forms or data fields that involve legal commitments, financial transactions, or sensitive data. According to the guideline, if the user can change or delete legal, financial, or test data, the system should provide mechanisms to help avoid unintended submissions. These mechanisms can include:
The importance of this recommendation is immense. Firstly, it minimizes the risk of serious consequences resulting from accidental submissions or errors. This could range from incorrect financial transactions to the unintentional sharing of sensitive information. Secondly, it enhances the overall user experience by making interactions more understandable and less prone to error.
While all users would benefit from such error prevention measures, the groups that benefit the most are typically those with disabilities. For example, individuals with cognitive disabilities might find it difficult to quickly identify and correct errors.
Similarly, people with motor disabilities who might struggle with precise inputs could accidentally select the wrong options. By implementing mechanisms to prevent errors, the accessibility and usability of web content for these users can be significantly improved.
To implement this WCAG recommendation, we take the following steps:
WCAG recommendation 4.1.3 refers to the practice of ensuring that any status messages on a website can be programmatically determined through assistive technologies without receiving focus.
Status messages are pieces of information that are typically provided to a user after they take certain actions, such as submitting a form, completing a process, or triggering an error. They can include success notifications, error messages, warning alerts, or progress indicators.
This recommendation is crucial for several reasons:
The individuals who benefit the most from the implementation of WCAG 4.1.3 are those with visual impairments or cognitive disabilities. For them, status messages communicated through screen readers or other assistive technologies can significantly enhance their ability to navigate and interact with the website effectively and independently.
However, in the broader sense, every user benefits from clear, concise, and immediate feedback provided by compliant status messages.
In order to effectively implement the WCAG recommendation 4.1.3, we adhere to the following procedures:
NOTE
When you choose the Section 508/WCAG option without any additional requirements, we implement the following WCAG recommendations by default:
1.1.1 None-text content
1.3.1 Info and relationships
1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence
1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics
1.3.4 Orientation
1.4.4 Text resize
1.4.5 Images of Text
1.4.10 Reflow
1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus
2.1.1 Keyboard
2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap
2.4.1 Bypass blocks
2.4.3 Focus Order
2.4.7 Focus Visible
3.1.1 Language of Page
3.1.2 Language of Parts
3.2.4 Consistent Identification
3.3.2 Labels or Instructions
4.1.1 Parsing
4.1.2 Name, Role, Value
That wraps up our review of the key web accessibility guidelines at Levels A and AA and our meticulous approach to implementing them.
As you see, our team of skilled developers and accessibility experts go the extra mile to intelligently incorporate accessibility features into websites. Whether it’s the use of clear and concise status messages or the inclusion of a review information screen for data verification, we make sure no stone is left unturned. This attention to detail guarantees that you receive a product that is not only robust and reliable, but also inclusive and accessible.
So, whether you’re a business looking to upgrade your current web presence or a startup wanting to ensure your website is accessible to all users from day one, we invite you to leverage our unrivaled expertise in this field.
With us, you can be confident that your digital platform will stand out for its excellence in accessibility, ultimately enhancing your reputation and reach.
Contact us today and experience the difference of working with a web development company that truly understands and implements web accessibility to perfection.